The Epstein Files: How Information Can Become Trauma
- Quinlan Jamieson

- Mar 6
- 2 min read
In January, 2026, the Department of Justice released the second batch of Epstein files. The millions of documents, videos, and photos include the most traumatic moments of the

people's lives. Now, this sensitive information is readily available for the public to look at.
How does this exposure to traumatic material affect the population of the U.S. and beyond?
When presenting information in court, such as what is found in the Epstein files, you must be very organized. Dumping millions of documents on your jury is never a good idea. But, right now, in the court of public opinion this graphic, gruesome information is being dumped on millions of people who don't have the resources to effectively use or process it.
Bad news and false information comes out every day, making it hard to assess the impacts this release will have on the people that look into it. One risk is re-traumatizing victims of sexual assault, whether their cases are connected to Epstein or not. Re-traumatization, which can happen when a victim is reminded of their traumatic experience, puts victims back into the headspace they experienced during the original traumatic event (SAMHSA).
Mr. King, a Psych teacher here at East, said, “Trauma survivors are seeing an in-direct "replay" of their own struggle in the news in a BIG WAY at the moment. It is like reopening a wound. However, I am also thankful that light is being shone on criminals, and for the attention that this story is getting.”
It's true that there's a fine line between productive and harmful coverage of this situation. While the information in the files may be hard to hear, that doesn't mean it should be hidden. Actually, the hardest information to hear is usually the information you need to hear the most; but there remains to be a right and wrong way to hear them.
There has definitely been an influx of harmful media coverage surrounding the Epstein files. From AI hallucinated statistics to youtubers such as Nico Grigg “Sneaking On To Epstein Island” to clickbait young people, it's clear this release has come with a fair amount of bad and problematic journalism.
The way a person reacts to looking into a case like this varies drastically from person to person. Personal history and past experiences play into this, in a big way. It’s important to know your personal limits when it comes to reading the news in general. If you find yourself feeling depressed, anxious, or apathetic it is ok to look away from the bad news, take a breath, and do something that brings you joy.


Comments